(no subject)
Sep. 19th, 2004 12:29 pmSo I wrote to John Cherry the Democrat senator up for reelection in Queensland. I wanted confirmation on the Democrats/Family First preferences. He's a gem of an email writer, this guy. Let me offer some examples:
"Dear Melinda"
Okay, I'm so not voting for this guys now. He can't even spell my name right! I can't believe I double checked how to spell his last name.
"I doubt very much if our preferences will be allocated in this election
(as I expect to win the last seat)."
Cough. Splutter. Cough. Arrogant much?
He goes on to tell me that their leader would be the first Aboriginal women elected if she won. I'm all for women in government. I'm all for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in government. But that doesn't mean we should vote for any old person just because they meet those criteria! It would be like voting me into parliment just because I'm young and female and they need more young females in parliment.
John goes on
"If you don't like this preference deal (which we were forced into to counterweight the Labor/Greens alliance), you have the option of allocating your own preferences by voting below the line in the Senate."
I do fill in all my preferences, but so many people run for the senate these days, that numbering all the boxes leads for the possibility of misnumbering, and therefore rendering a vote invalid. And one year, apparently the senate paper for New South Wales was too big to fit in the booth.
"Dear Melinda"
Okay, I'm so not voting for this guys now. He can't even spell my name right! I can't believe I double checked how to spell his last name.
"I doubt very much if our preferences will be allocated in this election
(as I expect to win the last seat)."
Cough. Splutter. Cough. Arrogant much?
He goes on to tell me that their leader would be the first Aboriginal women elected if she won. I'm all for women in government. I'm all for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in government. But that doesn't mean we should vote for any old person just because they meet those criteria! It would be like voting me into parliment just because I'm young and female and they need more young females in parliment.
John goes on
"If you don't like this preference deal (which we were forced into to counterweight the Labor/Greens alliance), you have the option of allocating your own preferences by voting below the line in the Senate."
I do fill in all my preferences, but so many people run for the senate these days, that numbering all the boxes leads for the possibility of misnumbering, and therefore rendering a vote invalid. And one year, apparently the senate paper for New South Wales was too big to fit in the booth.
no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:06 pm (UTC)I wrote back and called him arrogant and lazy. I love the power of email.
no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:16 pm (UTC)Bryn sent an abusive email to the Family First party.
I haven't abused any politicians lately, but I did make slashy remarks to the ALP candidate for Longman. He laughed.
He was hot.no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:19 pm (UTC)Mal Brough (I wonder how many people know that Mal Brough is Rob Brough's brother. Family Feud Rob Brough) tried to say that he couldn't represent the peple of Longman becuase he didn't have a family.
I'm waiting for a response
no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:28 pm (UTC)Tony Abbott is in danger of losing his seat.
no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:30 pm (UTC)Someone wrote poopyhead?
For shame.
no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2004-09-18 08:57 pm (UTC)Where is this wonderful information?
Pity I can't get Ruddock out of mine :(
And yes, the tablecloth senate paper. I think that was at state level and they changed some of the rules after that.
no subject
on 2004-09-18 11:57 pm (UTC)Oh my.
You had to fold it a hundred times and have 10 people help you stuff it in the itty bitty hole it had. Was murder!